Implementation guidance on materiality assessment from EFRAG

August 24, 2023
Sustainability in Business
EFRAG reviewed the initial draft of the Implementation guidance for the materiality assessment on August 23. This document outlines practical information and FAQ on the materiality assessment. After the initial review, this document will be released for a public commenting period of four weeks, following which the final document will be released after approval.

EFRAG reviewed the initial draft of the Implementation guidance for the materiality assessment on August 23. This document outlines practical information and FAQ on the materiality assessment. After the initial review, this document will be released for a public commenting period of four weeks, following which the final document will be released after approval.

EFRAG drafted the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) which was adopted by the European Commission as a delegated regulation on July 31, 2023. The organization works closely with EU regulators on the technical requirements for sustainability reporting under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). As outlined in the adopted delegated regulation, a “materiality assessment” is a required activity for organizations to determine the scope of “sustainability matters” that should be reported under the CSRD. It is therefore, a crucial starting point of sustainability initiatives.

The draft Implementation guidance for the materiality assessment builds on previous work by Global Reporting Initiative who helped construct the concept of “double materiality” for sustainability and develop the stakeholder process for materiality assessment. Indeed it is mentioned in the implementation guidance that “(a)n assessment performed under GRI constitutes a good basis for the assessment of impacts under ESRS.” To reinforce interoperability with the ISSB standards, it is also mentioned that “(r)eflecting the equivalence of the scope of financial materiality in ISSB standards and ESRS, an undertaking that applies ESRS is expected to be able to comply with the identification of the risks and opportunities to be disclosed under IFRS.”

Several key concepts cross-referenced between the regulation and the standards included as annexes to the regulation are important for understanding:

The guidance places importance on the determination of “materiality” from a “double materiality” perspective. A particularly interesting formulation of the interaction between impact and financial materiality is illustrated by the following graphic, in which impact materiality and financial materiality are determined separately, and an area of intersection is present such that a certain sustainability matter can be considered “material” from both impact and financial perspective

((Reproduced from EFRAG’s Implementation Guidance for Materiality Assessment)

Does this mean that two separate, independent materiality assessments should be conducted? The answer provided by the implementation guidance is to start with the impact materiality assessment, since the financial materiality assessment shall consider the outcome of the impact materiality assessment which may trigger risks and opportunities. An assessment of financial materiality that does not have impact materiality implications may be supplemented.

Since reporting organizations vary in scale, complexity and context, the ESRS does not dictate a particular process for materiality assessment. Rather, the guidance outlines a process derived from current best practices which includes an assessment of the context and definition of stakeholder engagement, the identification of potential sustainability matters and impacts, risks and opportunities, and the determination of the final list based on an objective, threshold-based method. Finally, the reporting of the process and output should be conducted based on the relevant ESRS standards, particularly IRO-1, SBM-3, and IRO-2.

To determine impact materiality, the implementation guidance provides further clarification of the key criteria of severity and likelihood.

As the implementation timeline of CSRD approaches, the scope of a materiality assessment envisioned under this regulation becomes more clear. It builds on the impact materiality framework of the GRI standards, and is in alignment with the financial materiality emphasis of the ISSB. The materiality assessment is emerging as a process that seeks to identify the most significant impacts and financial implications relevant for analysts of sustainability statements, supplementing the analysis of financial statements. This information becomes relevant for investment analysis incorporating sustainability and financial statements.

Sign up for our newsletter

We send newsletters to update our subscribers on sustainability-related content and our platform. You can sign up to receive newsletters by completing this form.

Thank you!

Your submission has been received!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form :(

Linkedin iconfacebook iconsubstack icon